This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
What relevance does the Further reading section have to rest of the topic? Kev (talk) 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
It didn't have any relevance. I removed it. Knox490 (talk) 23:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
Burchard makes money by teaching people to create "info products" and sell them on the internet. This is the exact thing described in the "Further reading" ref. Unclear to me how neither of you can see this. Are you unaware of what Burchard sells or did you not actually read the further reading article? Jytdog (talk) 00:58, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The tone does not really reflect how BLPs should be written, even though the secondary sources are a good start. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiko (talk • contribs) 16:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
