Talk:Bredgar and Wormshill Light Railway

Mid Kent Light Railway

Given the interesting history of the originally proposed Mid Kent Light Railway as outlined on the BWLR website[1] this article would benefit greatly with the addition of historical detail. In this regard I have contacted the railway for their assistance.--John Gibbard (talk) 11:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

What a wonderful tale. I suspect it would fall under the category of "Fictional Railways" however, especially given that I suspect the note "First published privately in April 1997" at the bottom of the page may indicate a publication date not far away from April 1st. 1997... Gwernol 12:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Per this discussion I think this is simply an imaginary history intended to amuse the rail enthusiasts. It would be nice if BWLR came back with something to the contrary but I fear the railway is a 'new' installation built circa the 1970s. Dick G (talk) 00:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I can confirm, having visited the B&W many times, spoken to the staff, and even driven one of the locos (Katie), that the pre-history of the line is - sadly - entirely fictional! regards, Lynbarn (talk) 12:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bredgar and Wormshill Light Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928100835/http://www.bwlr.co.uk/bugle.php to http://www.bwlr.co.uk/bugle.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bredgar and Wormshill Light Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090412034342/http://www.bwlr.co.uk/locos.php?flag=f042 to http://www.bwlr.co.uk/locos.php?flag=f042
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090412034457/http://www.bwlr.co.uk/locos.php?flag=no9 to http://www.bwlr.co.uk/locos.php?flag=no9
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090412034347/http://www.bwlr.co.uk/locos.php?flag=hudswell to http://www.bwlr.co.uk/locos.php?flag=hudswell
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bwlr.co.uk/beancars.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)