Talk:BraveStarr

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Series air dates edit

The article on Bravestarr at Internet Movie Database[[1]], referenced in External links, appears to have the incorrect ending date for the Bravestarr series. Other cartoon and TV episode sites (now listed in the reference section of the article) indicate that the final episode aired in Feb 1988. This would be consistent with the fact that the show ran for one season, and with the number of episodes created. --LiniShu 04:30, 28 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

YouTube links edit

 
Info icon

This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message on the talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material violating someone's copyright. If you are not sure whether the link on this article should be removed or if you would like to help spread this message, contact us on User talk:J.smith/YouTube Linklist. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 00:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The compound word "BraveStarr" is most commonly spelled with capital letters on both the modifier and the head ("Brave" and "Starr"). It is featured this way in the BraveStarr logo and on the official BraveStarr website. Such capitalization is also found in fellow '80s properties like ThunderCats and RoboCop. Cale (talk) 09:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've requested it be moved by the admin people.--NeilEvans (talk) 14:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Also since the name is contraction of two words Brave and Star the name is CamelCase meaning it should also not run afowl of the WP:MOSTM. --70.48.175.125 (talk) 18:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Bravestarr3030.jpg edit

 

Image:Bravestarr3030.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Comic Series edit

In the merchandise section, there is mention of Blackthorne Publishing's Bravestarr series, but I have various issues of First Comics publications with very low-key advertisements for a Bravestarr series. These are from late '86/early '87. It never happened as far as I can tell. Does anyone know if the went to Blackthorne instead or were they separate series and First's was just cancelled? I know it doesn't matter, but I am curious.75.69.39.43 (talk) 01:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sherlock Holmes Spin-Off edit

I've seen the "Sherlock Holmes in the 23rd Century" eps. of BraveStarr, and they seem like quite obvious attempts at spinning the character off via a backdoor pilot. I wonder if there is any documentation out there to back this up so it could be included in the wiki. Artemisstrong (talk) 17:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Opinion based content edit

On a related note, I feel that the sentence "This lends a steampunk flavor to the series and is a logical extension of the series' setting." should be removed as it is opinion, rather than fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.98.4 (talk) 15:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BraveStarr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on BraveStarr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BraveStarr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply