Talk:Brand Hong Kong

Latest comment: 12 years ago by WakingDragon1 in topic BrandHK conflict with trading name

Fair use rationale for Image:BrandHK.svg edit

 

Image:BrandHK.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Source for PMJ Regan's edit edit

Just a note to other editors - User:PMJ Regan's edits are sourced from Brand Hong Kong itself, found here - [1]. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 13:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Need third party references edit

This article needs third party references to justify the content which is very promotional in nature. Please read WP:BURDEN. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 14:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

BrandHK conflict with trading name edit

Hello,

There is a company in Hong Kong called BrandHK (www.brandhk.com) which has been trading for nearly 10 years. I would recommend that there is a not added to this entry to reflect the fact that this company may be what the user is looking for.

Kind Regards WakingDragon1 (talk) 11:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply