Talk:Branch Wars

My GA Review of this article

I quick-failed this GAN because the Lead and Production sections (not necessary in Plot section per WP:Television episodes) are not supported by any reliable sources. --Eustress (talk) 23:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

My (Second) GA Review of this article

A good article has the following attributes:

  1. It is well written. In this respect:
         (a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
         (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.

• I fixed any remaining issues I had with the article.

  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it:
         (a) provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout;
         (b) at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons;[2] and
         (c) contains no original research.

• Good

  3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it:
         (a) addresses the major aspects of the topic;[3] and
         (b) stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details (see summary style).

• Good

  4. It is neutral; that is, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.

• Good

  5. It is stable; that is, it is not the subject of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Vandalism reversion, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing) and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.

• No prior issues

  6. It is illustrated, where possible, by images.[4] In this respect:
         (a) images used are tagged with their copyright status, and fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
         (b) the images are appropriate to the topic, and have suitable captions.[5]

• One image in good standing

Conclusion

I will pass the article to GA status...congrats! --Eustress (talk) 15:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

awesome! :) Enigma ^message 16:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Branch Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211215607/http://www.celebrityspider.com:80/news/october07/article102607-2.html to http://www.celebrityspider.com/news/october07/article102607-2.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121113213050/http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-4/59501/branch-wars/episode-410/59621/ to http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-4/59501/branch-wars/episode-410/59621/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)