Talk:Bothel, Cumbria

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 April 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

Comments edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is this village at all notable? With the dubious statements such as "People fight there", I'm tempted to nominate for deletion. Labrat256 23:07, 19 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Labrat256 (talk • contribs)

The AfD discussion for the article was a unanimous "keep", except for the nomination. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic