Talk:Boston Minutemen

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Fair use rationale for Image:Boston Minutemen.gif edit

 

Image:Boston Minutemen.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


Requested move 28 February 2014 edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Feel free to add hatnotes as desired. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply



Boston MinutemenBoston Minutemen (soccer) – The primary topic of "Boston Minutemen" are the Minutemen from/in Boston during the Revolutionary War, not this soccer team. Therefore "Boston Minutemen" should redirect to Minutemen. 70.50.151.11 (talk) 05:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Survey edit

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Mild support - I was all set to immediately support on WP:CAPS, but looking at Google books suggests "Boston minutemen" is a rare phrase in Revolutionary War context and not capitalized. But then this soccer team only ran 1974-1976 and the term in 2002 refers to "Massachusetts's largest Boy Scout council, the Boston Minutemen, took another stand for nondiscrimination June 10" ... raising a different reason for adding (soccer) to distinguish from http://www.bsaboston.org/ .. so support, but more because of the clash with the Boy Scouts of America membership controversies article content than because of the WP:CAPS issue. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
But if moved leave redirecting to (soccer), since too many incoming links to make creating an intervening dab worthwhile In ictu oculi (talk) 09:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
It should be an easy fix, since this article appears on a template that appears on many pages. The move should not have a problem with fixing incoming links. Just fixing the template should do most of the corrections. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 00:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. Boston minutemen isn't a term used to describe the Revolutionary War soldiers. They were known simply as minutemen. Hot Stop 19:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
    • How would you distinguish the minutemen from outside of Boston to those in Boston? Would you not use "Boston" as an adjective? -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 00:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
      • It doesn't matter where they're from, they're still minutemen. Hot Stop 02:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Mild oppose - It seems to me that this is a reasonably unlikely possible phrase to type in when looking for Minutemen. Hatnotes should be sufficient. Red Slash 17:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose There's no reason to move it from here, as the name that it is at right now is not all that big in Massachusetts vernacular, so it's not really confusing anyone right now. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

Any additional comments:
  •   Suggestion Regardless of the move decision, a hatnote to Minutemen plus disambiguation seems to be needed.
    SBaker43 (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boston Minutemen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply