Talk:Borealis Exploration

Deletion

How about waiting a sec while I finish writing the damn page. The company owns a bunch of subsidieries, and tons of patents. I saw it in Popular Science like 4 years ago, which almost speaks for itself as assertion of importance. Why don't you try searching for media coverage before you tag something for speedy? Fresheneesz 22:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I've asserted significance (the efficiency thing) and sourced it. A7 no longer holds. Fresheneesz 22:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Criteria for companies and corporations

REF: WP:CORP

A company or corporation is notable if it meets any of the following criteria:

1. The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself.
   • This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations except for the following:
     • Media reprints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company.
     • Works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories.
2. The company or corporation is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications.
3. The company's or corporation's share price is used to calculate stock market indices. Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises the entire market is excluded.

I do not find that this criteria has been met. I also suggest you review WP:CIVIL. The tone of your commeny on my talk page as well as this talk page does not demonstrate that you WP:AGF on my part. Jerry lavoie 22:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I've provided multiple non-trivial sources... What more do you want? I'm sorry about my tone, but I don't like having to defend my work when its extremely easy to go and find sources for it. Suggesting a speedy delete while i'm working on it is not very good tact. I'll assume good faith, but don't try to delete my work based on shaky reasoning like A7 - i've asserted significance. Please put this up on WP:AfD so that this can be setteled. Fresheneesz 22:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Firstly, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I am not interested in being your foe. I had no way to know you were editing the article. If you feel strongly that this article meets the notability criteria, I'll back off.Jerry lavoie 22:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

As the company has been covered by Motor Trend magazine (www.MotorTrend.com/features/editorial/112_0901_flying_hybrids_technologue/index.html), Airforce-Techonology.com (www.Airforce-Technology.com/features/feature74127/) and other publications (like Air Transportation World) have covered a subsidiary that liscences it's techonology, I think the company is notable. Chovesh (talk) 18:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Subsidiary merge-ins

Chorus Motors and Wheeltug should be merged to here. Other subsidiaries already redirect to here. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 20:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Borealis Exploration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100818053150/http://www.wheeltug.gi/press/pr_WT20100201.shtml to http://www.wheeltug.gi/press/pr_WT20100201.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Borealis Exploration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130626064731/http://www.pse.cz/Novinky/Detail.aspx?ka=2822 to https://www.pse.cz/Novinky/Detail.aspx?ka=2822

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)