Talk:Bog snorkelling
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
WRT Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Bog_Snorkelling, I'm dying to know who I'm a sock puppet for... — ciphergoth 12:39, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bog snorkelling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050924064259/http://llanwrtyd-wells.powys.org.uk:80/bogtriathlon.htm to http://llanwrtyd-wells.powys.org.uk/bogtriathlon.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bog snorkelling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20100722055048/http://www.irishbogsnorkelling.com/index-09.htm to http://www.irishbogsnorkelling.com/index-09.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
World Championship Results edit
There seems to be one editor ( 1 person) who keeps deleting our wonderful historical results of the World Championship. Lets all have a say here as to whether you think that Bog Snorkelling World Championship Results do have a place in history, and should be documented in Wikipedia for as long as it lasts. Just make a comment YES (we should have them), or NO (omit them from history), do note that we only kept a record of the winner each year. Anyone who reinstates them, find some good sources to back it up.
I will start the vote. YES Thank you Dickie-bow-tie (talk) 22:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia does not decide content by voting, see WP:NOTAVOTE. Wikipedia is also not a webhost or a place to store unsourced information. If you want to keep off-mission content online, do so on your own web site. We all have to follow the Wikipedia's content policies here, even if a vocal minority doesn't like them. MrOllie (talk) 00:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Dickie-bow-tie, when I advised you at the Teahouse to discuss this issue on this talk page, I also told you that you would need to address the core content policy of Verifiability. You have not done so. You cannot hold a mock "election" here that leads to an illegitimate local consensus to disregard a core content policy. That is simply not going to happen. What you need to do is address the specific issue of verifiability policy in this case, and improve the referencing of the content you want to add, so that other editors will agree that it belongs in the article. As for
wonderful historical results
, which historian describes the results as wonderful, and where was that published? Please also familiarize yourself with another core content policy, the Neutral point of view. Boosterism is not permitted on Wikipedia, and we make content decisions based on policies and guidelines, not on personal enthusiasm for the topic. Cullen328 (talk) 07:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Dickie-bow-tie, when I advised you at the Teahouse to discuss this issue on this talk page, I also told you that you would need to address the core content policy of Verifiability. You have not done so. You cannot hold a mock "election" here that leads to an illegitimate local consensus to disregard a core content policy. That is simply not going to happen. What you need to do is address the specific issue of verifiability policy in this case, and improve the referencing of the content you want to add, so that other editors will agree that it belongs in the article. As for