Talk:Body grooming

Merge with hair removal

Body grooming should be merged with hair removal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djbefaves (talk • contribs) 00:14, 19 October 2009‎

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. However a merge as proposed in the discussion could gain consensus. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Body grooming → Manscaping – This new title seems to be a much more common name, and also makes clear that the article focuses on men. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

• Rename this article focuses on men, not everyone. 70.24.251.224 (talk) 04:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
• Comment (1) where is the article head hatnote to female body grooming and animal body grooming? (2) WP:Recentism means there are plentiful hits, but The Soldier's Guide: The Complete Guide to U.S. Army Traditions, Department of the Army - 2007 "HYGIENE AND BODY GROOMING 3-79. Soldiers will maintain good personal hygiene and grooming on a daily basis. Not only is this an indicator of a disciplined soldier, but also demonstrates respect for others and for the uniform." is a bit more solid as WP:RS. (3) Suggest improve article before making WP:Title changes. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:53, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Actually it should just be merged to the much better article at hair removal per 2009 comment above or AfDed. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

• Oppose per WP:BIAS but strongly support a merger with hair removal as suggested by User:In ictu oculi. This article is a mess and there is no noteworthy info here that wouldn't fit just fine with that article. —  AjaxSmack  01:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
• Oppose -- I cannot see the point of moving this to a WP:NEOLOGISM, of which I have never heard. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Body grooming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100420004919/http://www.malehair-removal.com:80/ to http://www.malehair-removal.com
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081222030406/http://www.malehairremoval.net:80/ to http://www.malehairremoval.net
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100511163814/http://male-hair-removal.net:80/ to http://male-hair-removal.net

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC