| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
burglarized??? edit
Surely that is not a real word?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.22.237.2 (talk) 16:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
That's exactly what I was going to comment on. An example of a word there is absolutely no need for when one (burgled) already exists. Guv2006 (talk) 08:38, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Burglarized is by far the more common form in US English, while in the UK it's reversed. It should be noted that the word burglar preceded the words burgle and burglarize by several centuries. Adding an -ize suffix is a perfectly standard way of turning a noun into a verb: Hospitalize, unionize, prioritize. The only reason it may sound a little strange is because the original word ends in r. Even then, there are words ending in r constructed the same way: Familiarize, mesmerize, bowdlerize.
Although it isn't wrong, I see no reason for the article to have been changed. 50.135.209.86 (talk) 10:54, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
I am changing Burglarized. Jamesthecat (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
I've changed my mind. Looks as if burglarized is an actual word. Jamesthecat (talk) 02:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Yes it is... and for that matter, the word "robbers" needs to be changed to "burglars". Burglary is done when the victim is not present. Robbers take things directly from the victim in person, usually while threatening them with a weapon. So these people were burglars, not robbers. 192.54.250.11 (talk) 16:45, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Oh yes, it's an actual word though, personally, I would be suspicious of the validity of any encyclopaedia which used it. Guv2006 (talk) 08:40, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Since this article is written about an American subject, it should use American English variations. Per Wiktionary, "burglarize" is the most common North American word for the action of committing the crime of burglary. "Burgle" is more common in the UK and some former Commonwealth countries. I have replaced every instance with "burglarize" per WP:ENGVAR. Please do not change it back without discussing. Ivanvector (talk) 15:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Nick Prugo section plus edit
Zoloft is for depression, not anxiety. And nobody has said "Hooked on drugs" since the 1970s (should be "chemical dependency" or "substance abuse" or the like, rather than dated misanthropic slang).
Is it actually important to point out that Tess was adopted?
It is stated "Lee was reported to have instantly turned hysterical, acting as though she were suddenly sick", However the original Vanity Fair states "becoming nearly hysterical, physically ill, and gagging", saying nothing about acting.
Burglarized is more common to the US but burgled is less sensational/more encyclopedic. Tangverse (talk) 13:36, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Cast of The Bling Ring edit
The names in the Film depictions section don't seem to match up with The_Bling_Ring#Cast. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Bling Ring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121102113952/http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-5448653-504083.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody to http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-5448653-504083.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121102113956/http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20011644-504083.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody to http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20011644-504083.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
TV personalities edit
Didn't two of the perps have their own reality TV show? Maikel (talk) 10:20, 10 October 2018 (UTC)