Talk:Blackburn Firecrest
Latest comment: 17 years ago by MoRsE in topic Assessment comment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blackburn Firecrest article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Blackburn Firecrest has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Blackburn Firecrest/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| I find it hard to see how this article could be expanded. Was the aircraft some middle stage of some development? Did something special happen during its construction and evaluation stage? --MoRsE 11:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 11:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)