Talk:Black hole bomb
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that a physics diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Need a better Article edit
This article needs to be rewritten. It has the cart before the horse. The Press and Teukolsky (1972) paper should be mentioned first. It and and later papers first discussed zero rest mass scalar, electromagnetic and gravitational waves scattered by way of supperradiance long before the massive scalar boson field mechanism was discovered. There should be a hyperlink to Superradience which is on Wikipedia where a discussion is given of black hole bombs. The history could be greatly expanded and many more references from the physics literature given. aajacksoniv (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Lnk edit
Someone just deleted the link
- Kurzgesagt (22 April 2018). "The Black Hole Bomb and Black Hole Civilizations on YouTube". Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell.
{{cite episode}}: External link in|title=
-- 70.51.203.56 (talk) 03:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
All what's wrong in black hole physics today edit
This kind of theory is a summation of all what's wrong in current black hole physics. A black hole absorbs matter in immense amounts, it's a gravity well, it can't give out energy like that, even "under very particular conditions" ("yeah but if I do some magical invocations I can levitate you know"), if you have something spinning that can create a bounce effect this spinning thing is not a black hole, simply. Do people take a breath sometimes, take some distance and really look at what they are reading or do they just gobble "because it's a well-known physicist" so let's not think ? This theory is a contradiction in nature, to be shelved along the theory that cows and dogs can fly... it's true that theories like that are certainly more appealing, more FUNNY. LOL-physics where you can go through a wormhole, travel in time, also walk on water, wake up the dead, multiply fish & bread... yeaahh of course, of course...
There is a very different thing which is the eruption of a black hole, the rare event in which some of the matter accumulated and compressed inside erupts, leading to the birth of stars, planets, moons, this is described in From an Einstein Syndrome to the People, astrophysics chapter, with more details given in the first parts of http://pubs.sciepub.com/ijp/7/4/4/index.html. --2A01:CB1D:4F5:6300:54BE:86D5:684E:E84A (talk) 10:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)