Talk:Black Isle's Torn

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleBlack Isle's Torn has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 3, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
September 10, 2006Good article nomineeListed
December 17, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

Good Article nomination has failed edit

The Good article nomination for Black Isle's Torn has failed, for the following reason:

Longer than the subject warranted

Ghosts&empties 17:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Citations edit

As citing every source separately would be pure madness (since most of the article is taken from only a handful of sources), I have placed a single citation at the bottom of each section and subsection (aside from Development history), which act as a citations for their entire respective sections. This is to address possible future citation concerns. So please do not pepper the article with {{fact}} templates and the like. JimmyBlackwing 19:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Good Article nomination on hold edit

I am placing this nomination on hold for the following reasons.

  1. I would like to see the redlinks eliminated especially for Mr. Maldonado, understand if the games section redlinks are next projects, however maybe they should be left off until those articles are completed?
  2. Possibly explain the citing rationale listed above (and I do understand working from limited resources) in a sentence within the lead or a tag at top, something along the lines of "Due to the limited nature of source materials, citations will appear at the end of sections", this will reduce the attempts by other editors to request citation, without checking the existing ones.
  3. In all, for a cancelled game, I think this is well done, though I do not forsee WP:FA in it's future. I also think the length is appropriate. What would be inappropriate would be fifteen or twenty paragraphs of "It would have been cool if..."UnseemlyWeasel 02:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Thank you for the response. I have taken care of the issues you mentioned. JimmyBlackwing 05:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Player Races edit

I don't see any info on the player races or the world itself, there was a ton of stuff in one of the old articles published at the time, including a map with place names. --68.81.70.65 (talk) 01:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why mention D&D edit

In the first section it is mentioned that Torn was to take place in it's own world, "instead of a traditional Dungeons & Dragons location". Is there any reason for mentioning D&D at all at this point? After all, the game system has been cited as being SPECIAL, which so far, has only been used in games which work in alternative realities based on our own history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FrederikHertzum (talkcontribs) 08:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reference material edit

Found this: Computer Gaming World feature. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Isle's Torn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Black Isle's Torn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Source edit