Rresponse to message left on my talkpage @Audacity: I certainly can respect the funding round being in there. I would suggest that only one of those four sources is needed though to support it. Because of 1RR I am reluctant to make that change myself but think you could without running into DS issues. The Hack section is definitely better. At this point is the first paragraph needed at all? Also it seems like It is likely that the hacker obtained the signing key of Bitfinex and started sending withdrawal signing requests to BitGo, which blindly processed the transactions without further checks.
is controversial enough that it needs its own source otherwise it should be removed. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:29, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
- @Barkeep49: Thanks for the suggestions. I made some changes accordingly - take a look. Cheers, Λυδαcιτγ 03:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
- @Audacity: Works for me. Thanks and Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
