Talk:Beyond Magenta/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 05:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately, this article is far enough below the GACR that I believe it must be a quickfail at this time. GACR #3 requires the article to be "broad in its coverage", but this article entirely omits any summary of the actual contents of the book. The reception section is underdeveloped, merely a short list of pull quotes without any cohesion. I find it difficult to believe that there is no scholarly analysis of the book, which is almost a decade old at this point. With apologies, as I can see that this is a first GA nomination. I do hope you take some time to work on the article and renominate it, because the subject matter deserves the GA treatment. I would recommend looking at existing GAs and FAs on books to get an idea of how to structure a well-written book article. (See Wikipedia:Good articles/Language and literature and Wikipedia:Featured articles#Literature and theatre). ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.