Talk:Beverley Grammar School

March 2007

Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as it has recently been editted, then I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of High on this importance scale.

My reasoning is as follows: This school is 1300 years old and is one of the oldest in the UK. Victuallers 14:42, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I Do Not Understand

some of the infomation on this article that was true has been deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.208.98 (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

If there is anything factual that has been deleted, then feel free to add the data here, then an admin will restore that information to the text. The article has been protected from editing due to a spate of very tedious and juvenile vandalism. People have better things to do than continuously removing vandalism.

If, on the other hand, what you want is to add more vandalism, under the guise of "well its true, X does have bad breath", then you are out of luck. Mayalld (talk) 10:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Alumni - Beverley Grammar School

Two of the school houses when I was there in the 1970's were "Fisher" and "Conington". I'm surprised not to see a reference to both in the alumni section? The wiki section on John Fisher mentions his attendance at the school, but the school entry does not mention him. A web search for John Conington will also reveal that he attended Beverley Grammar School. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.78.158.96 (talk • contribs) 23:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

I have added these to the list as info in their articles confirms this. Keith D (talk) 23:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.bgs.eriding.net/schoolhistory.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Note - the above referred to the section of the article relating to the History of the school, which has been removed. Keith D (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Sixth Oldest

I doubt that this school is the fourth oldest in England: We have King's School, Canterbury (founded 597),the King's School, Rochester (604), St Peter's School, York, England (627), Thetford Grammar School, Thetford, England (631), Royal Grammar School Worcester, England (685) and then comes Beverley Grammar School, England (700) Clearly the Sixth oldest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.98.209 (talk) 02:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I have added a New Houses section

I have added information for the houses as i felt that it had relative importance to be included,I have read the School's own version of it's house history and included references to it, When writing down the information i was reading the information and it is loosely based on the school's own text, but it is my own and is not copied/pasted straight from their site, I have also removed the Croatian language because the information was so old it was incorrect and consisted of only a few lines and the logo. Aidancrane (talk) 23:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beverley Grammar School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/oxedu_reports/display/%28id%29/64122
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/oxedu_reports/display/%28id%29/100292
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131024031609/http://www.beverleygrammar.co.uk/about/school-improvement-plan/ to http://www.beverleygrammar.co.uk/about/school-improvement-plan/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beverley Grammar School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141205074205/http://oce.catholic.com/index.php?title=John_Alcock to http://oce.catholic.com/index.php?title=John_Alcock

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)