A fact from Bessie Anstice Baker appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Bessie Anstice Baker is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of the Australian Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australian Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Australian Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Australian Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Australian Women in ReligionAustralian Women in Religion articles
Bessie Anstice Baker is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created/expanded by PMCH2 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC).Reply
@PMCH2: This article is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain, the hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ is needed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Theleekycauldron. This nomination is now good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @Theleekycauldron:! I appreciate your stepping in; that's very kind. Sorry for the slow response. Thank you also @Cwmhiraeth: for the quick review. PMCH2 (talk) 20:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
.jpg){kind=small}
@PMCH2: This article is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain, the hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ is needed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Theleekycauldron. This nomination is now good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
