This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Chemical and Bio EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringChemical and Bio Engineering articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 4 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion
Looks like tags were added by two editors at once. I'm not seeing anything to warrant the Autobiographical tag, nothing in the article that I'm seeing lacks neutrality, balance, or impartiality, so I'm removing that. If I missed something, please comment here. The two source tags are sort of a dealer's choice. Single source one seems a bit more appropriate so we'll go with that. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
The article's subject is adding extremely promotional content eg. "Benny is a leading researcher". To accept an autobiographical draft with a single primary source seems astounding to me? Theroadislong (talk) 22:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yeah it is for sure warranted now. WP:GOODFAITH is out the window. I've also requested page protection.Sulfurboy (talk) 22:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Also it was accepted out of AfC, because subject undoubtedly passes WP:PROFSulfurboy (talk) 22:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
There's nothing 'undoubtedly' about it. See WP:V. An autobiography with one citation? What's that doing in mainspace? It doesn't matter if this was Einstein - without sourcing, we don't know if the claims here stand up, and that matters. (Does it?) Andy Dingley (talk) 23:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
He passes the 5th prong of WP:PROF, in that he has a named chair appointment. This is backed by a listed reference the source of which is the school's own website, making it wholly reliable. The AfC standard is whether or not an article would likely pass a AfD discussion, which it most assuredly would since it easily passes the aforementioned prong . However, if you disagree I would encourage you to nominate it for AfD. Sulfurboy (talk) 00:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
I saw that already, it's the only reason I didn't AfD it. But it's still not cited. A ref on the page (with a title that gives no indication) isn't enough.
This is probably a notable BLP. But I can't see that it's a notable BLP - and that's not good enough to go into mainspace. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Also, what's with the subst (?) of the infobox, and the great wodge of conditional parser expressions it has dumped in the top? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure what you mean by not being able to see the citation. All that's required is that the claim (that he has a named chair appointment) is verifiable, and it is in fact verifiable by the reference in the article. Sulfurboy (talk) 00:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
