Talk:Bellefleur

Requested move 27 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian (talk) 21:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

---

Bellefleur (disambiguation) → Bellefleur – Previous article merged; no primary topic, move dabpage to base name 162 etc. (talk) 19:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). 162 etc. (talk) 22:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

@162 etc., found some sources, e.g. [1]. I am a bit on the side of reversing this merge, after adding sourced content, of course. Noting that there is minimal info on the novel on the author's article. Silikonz💬 19:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

I've moved the article to Bellefleur (novel) - even if this novel is article-worthy (which it very well may not be), it's not the primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 21:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

@162 etc.: Could you please clarify how you came to that conclusion? In addition - are you planning to add content into the author's article from your merged redirects? Best, Silikonz💬 21:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

The article is unsourced, and the book is not notable. See WP:NBOOK and WP:BOOKCRIT. 162 etc. (talk) 21:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

​I have found a reliable source, added it, and will continue searching. I am still curious as to the answer of my second question. (If this discussion becomes too lengthy, it can take place somewhere else.) Silikonz💬 22:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Indeed, better to discuss this pagemove first, before moving on to the subject of merging. 162 etc. (talk) 22:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

• Support per nomination. There are five bulleted entries listed upon the Bellefleur (disambiguation) page, with no indication that any among the two articles and the three WP:DABMENTIONS is primary over the remaining four entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
• Support if the novel isn't notable its unlikely to be primary. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:40, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.