| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beechcraft Duchess article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Aircraft edit
Hmm..
Not in total agreement with the text on this A/C. Many student pilots refer to the Piper Seminole as being under powered and the Beechcraft Duchess as being the more favourable kissing cousin..
J.
- I agree with this statement... I've found the Seminole to be underpowered compared to the Duchess. ChadScott 00:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
If anything less engine power makes single engine training easier. There is no requirement to hold altitude only airspeed and heading. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.113.50.250 (talk) 07:41, August 20, 2007 (UTC)
I put back the part about altitude holding not being required on practical tests because it isn't. http://www.faa.gov/education_research/testing/airmen/test_standards/pilot/media/FAA-S-8081-14A.pdf
Light twin airplanes are not required to hold altitude single engine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arf says (talk • contribs) 03:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)