Wikipedia

Talk:Beautiful Creatures (band)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

A Little Bias in the article edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

For Beautiful Creatures, he traded hair spray and the two-dimensional '80s sound for hair dye and a mix of glammy hooks with gritty, hard-hitting post-grunge rock.

You know not all 80s rock was 2 dimensional, in fact Bang Tango were a glam funk metal band. This statement seems to be written by a modern mark.

A little bias in the article? How about a LOT of bias in the article? I was going to comment here on that same statement, and I am glad to see someone else caught it. I'd like to see the person that wrote this article pick up a guitar and try to come close to that "two-dimensional" sound. Unless the article was written by George Lynch or Warren DiMartini, I don't think he/she has the right to make such a statement. As soon as I can figure out a way to word that comment better, I'm doing so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.131.29.136 (talk) 18:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I made a revision as I threatened above. Granted, it is just as biased, and I think I was making a point. If someone would like to revise the sentence to something more neutral, I will let the issue go.

Fair use rationale for Image:Bc album deuce.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Bc album deuce.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Beautifulcreatures-beautifulcreatures1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Beautifulcreatures-beautifulcreatures1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article Tone: Too informal? edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article reads like it was written for a gung-ho music magazine; it's a lot less formal in its presentation than most articles I've seen on Wikipedia. I'm not saying that's necessarily a bad thing; it's hard to be clinical and objective about a subject such as music, so perhaps the writing style here is strictly necessary to convey any information at all about the band. I just thought I'd raise the question. 12.73.132.33 (talk) 13:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

DJ Ashba edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

in the first line it says DJ Ashba, formerly of BulletBoys but i think it say DJ Ashba, currently in Guns n' Roses and Sixx:AM and formerly of BulletBoys

his work in GnR and sixx:am is probably his most famous work so it should be mentioned first — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.201.105 (talk) 20:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I disagree, this article is about Beautiful Creatures, not DJ Ashba, so what he is most famous for means little unless it directly contributed to the formation of this group. He was a former member of BulletBoys at the time of formation, Sixx:A.M. didn't exist and it would be years before he joined GnR. These are mentioned later in the article though. HrZ (talk) 16:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Beautiful Creatures (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Beautiful Creatures (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Beautiful Creatures (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beautiful_Creatures_(band)&oldid=1199724005"