Talk:Beam Reach

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MRSC in topic Page move

All links here are dead. A quick Google search shows some possible replacements, although the developer's site being down does rather raise a question over the status of the whole thing. If anybody knows what is going on and wants to update the article then please go ahead. --DanielRigal (talk) 12:00, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Beam Reach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Beam Reach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Page move edit

I really think that this article should be at Beam Reach (redevelopment area), while "Beam reach" should redirect to Point of sail#Reaching. The term "beam reach" is used by English-speaking sailors all over the world, and has been for centuries. A 21st-century PR department making a pun on Reach (geography) and the River Beam... it's sort of clever for a riverside development, but still a secondary use. MRSC, would you object to this change? Nice compact username, BTW. HLHJ (talk) 02:51, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

As a London area article if it requires disambiguation it would move to Beam Reach, London. Not totally opposed to that. But why not simply redirect Beam reach to the other page and leave this here? MRSC (talk) 05:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply