Talk:Be Here

Fair use rationale for Image:Behere2.jpg

Image:Behere2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Behere2.jpg

Image:Behere2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Be Here. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/keithurban/albums/album/6452942/review/6591125/be_here
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120417023320/http://www.australian-charts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Keith+Urban&titel=Be+Here&cat=a to http://australian-charts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Keith+Urban&titel=Be+Here&cat=a
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518094221/https://itunes.apple.com/ca/album/be-here/id724552576 to https://itunes.apple.com/ca/album/be-here/id724552576
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518094205/https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/be-here/id724552576 to https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/be-here/id724552576

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Edit War

@Binksternet: and @2607:fea8:6001:4a00:4906:4100:739d:440c:, please do not WP:EDITWAR. From what I can tell based on pictures of the album online, User:2607:fea8:6001:4a00:4906:4100:739d:440c is correct in this situation. I Could Fly is the seventh track on this album, and this article should show that. ChipotleHater (talk) 05:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I'm just following WP:BANREVERT which allows limitless reverts against a banned person. The guy needs to stay off Wikipedia: the Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Cambridge Canada vandal. If he stayed away and left the article alone I would fix it. Binksternet (talk) 06:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

First of all, I couldn't find any proof this person was the Cambridge Canada vandal. Second, this is not vandalizing. They are putting the correct information onto the article. I'm unsure why it is being reverted. ChipotleHater (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)