Talk:Be Alright (Ariana Grande song)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Be Alright (Ariana Grande song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 August 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We do not have a reliable source which states the song received the overwhelming adulation of every living being on the planet, rage inspiring hatred or anything in between ("acclaim", "positive reviews", "mixed-to-neutral-to-wishy-washy reviews", whatever). Instead, we have various reviews saying what various individual critics thought of the song. Adding those sources together into one statement is synthesis. - SummerPhDv2.0 01:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- "Critical acclaim" is synthesis. "Positive reviews" is synthesis. Please discuss the issue.
- As neither one of you is using a registered account, page protection, if needed, will shut both of you down. - SummerPhDv2.0 15:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Well then you'd better go to every single page with reviews and remove where it says "The song received positive/mixed/negative reviews", because I guess that's all synth, right? 73.81.150.215 (talk) 15:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, other pages exist. Some of them are nearly perfect, some are horrible, most are in between.
- This article has a recurring problem with WP:SYTH. Do you not understand how it applies or do you feel this particular page should be exempt from our policy? - SummerPhDv2.0 20:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Be Alright (Ariana Grande song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160701151529/http://portuguesecharts.com/archive.asp?todo=show&woche=12&jahr=2016&sparte=s to http://portuguesecharts.com/archive.asp?todo=show&woche=12&jahr=2016&sparte=s
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)