Talk:Battle of Ridgeway

Untitled

Canada West

Is it normal in Wikipedia to use the historical terms for places as opposed to the modern names? If the former is the norm, then how about changing "Ridgeway, Canada West" so that only the word Ridgeway is a link to the Ridgeway Ontario page and the "Canada West" words are a link to the Canada West page (my bad for not searching for that in the first place, I guess I assumed that since it wasn't linked, it didn't exist.) Cheers, CraigWyllie 02:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC) (edited 18:55 Aug 20 2006 as 65.92.174.114)

It is customary to use placenames contemporary to the events being described in historical articles. The actual link on the name leads to Ridgeway, Ontario, so anyone wanting to find out more would have little difficulty. Geoff NoNick 12:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Victory

The comment on Geoff NoNick's revert today claims that it was a British victory. However the "Infobox Military Conflict" states that it was a Fenian victory. The text states "The Ridgeway victory was complemented by a second successful engagement later that day at Fort Erie" - and the "battle" at Fort Erie was clealry a Fenian victory. The "Battle at Fort Erie" page states reflects that statement, and also states that the Battle of Ridgeway was a Fenian victory. Even though I'm Canadian I'm inclined to agree. The Fenians retired from the field after the Canadians had fled but did so for reasons not connected to the action itself. It does seem to be true that it was a close battle, reading the Queens Own Rifiles External Link indicates that had the Canadians not paniced they may have carried the day, and the number of casualties were low on both sides.

I'd like to see the sentence "The Ridgeway victory was complemented by a second successful engagement later that day at Fort Erie" reworded, as no-where else in the main body of the article does it clearly state whose victory it was (other than the infobox, and I missed that the first time I read the page). I find the sentence a bit inelegant. Cheers, CraigWyllie 02:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC) (edited 18:55 Aug 20 2006 as 65.92.174.114)

Agreed - my apologies for not noticing the incongrueties before. Perhaps "The inconclusive engagement at Ridgeway was followed by a Fenian victory at Fort Erie later that day." Geoff NoNick 12:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

fenian uniforms what kind of uniforms would the fenians have worn would it have been the greenish coloured uniform shown in the picture —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bouse23 (talk • contribs) 16:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Battle of Ridgeway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120924012704/http://www.ridgewaybattle.ca:80/casualties.htm to http://www.ridgewaybattle.ca/casualties.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120612091834/http://www.historicplaces.ca/en/rep-reg/place-lieu.aspx?id=16025&pid=0 to http://www.historicplaces.ca/en/rep-reg/place-lieu.aspx?id=16025&pid=0
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110806123630/http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~dbertuca/g/FenianRaid.html to http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~dbertuca/g/FenianRaid.html
• Dead link fixed. Carcharoth (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111203105831/http://www.ridgewaybattle.ca:80/ to http://www.ridgewaybattle.ca
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726052146/http://www.fenians.org/fenianlinks.htm to http://www.fenians.org/fenianlinks.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Ridgeway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ridgewaybattle.ca/casualties.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ridgewaybattle.ca/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050830060555/http://www.qor.com/history/ridgeway.html to http://www.qor.com/history/ridgeway.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)