Talk:Battle of Iron Works Hill

Battle of Iron Works Hill has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Battle of Iron Works Hill is part of the New York and New Jersey campaign series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 3, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
April 28, 2010	Good topic candidate	Not promoted
December 17, 2010	Good topic candidate	Promoted
May 30, 2020	Good topic removal candidate	Kept
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 23, 2023.
Current status: Good article

Military history: British / European / North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

New Jersey Mid‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ensured that the article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Use of "sic" edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

According to the article on sic, it is to be used when a spelling or grammatical error is in a citation and thus not an error of transcription. The citation quoted here uses a historically correct spelling of the word "maneuver." Since no error (it is historically correct) is in the citation, the inclusion of the "sic" is the error. Current usage and spelling is not superior, just different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.121.204.129 (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic