Talk:Battle of Hoover's Gap

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Campaign? edit

I don't understand why the Tullahoma Campaign page is only about the Battle of Hoover's Gap. Randy Golden (talk) 13:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Ensured that the article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. It would benefit from: expansion, sections (Prelude, The battle, Aftermath), and in-text citations. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply




Hoover's Gap was the only actual battle during the campaign; all of the rest was maneuvering. Our normal practice is to have a separate campaign article that summarizes the actions in multiple battles, including a campaign map, if possible, but since this one has only one battle, we (I) did not bother. It is on my to-do list, but not at a very high priority. You are welcome to take a stab at it. Check out some of the other campaign articles, such as Gettysburg Campaign or Northern Virginia Campaign for examples. Hal Jespersen (talk) 16:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Hoover's Gap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply