Talk:Battle of Geneina

Latest comment: 11 days ago by FuzzyMagma in topic El Geneina Massacre page

First Battle? edit

Do we usually label battles as 1st before a subsequent one has begun?64.43.183.222 (talk) 01:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, I changed it. Yxuibs (talk) 03:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Infobox footnote? edit

The infobox currently has a footnote claiming "To delete parts of the phases or to add please discuss in the talk page before any changes". Shouldn't this belong in a comment inside the source code, rather than a footnote displayed in the article itself, as it is only indented for editors rather than any reader? It feels quite unencyclopedic to have it out in the open like this. Chaotic Enby (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

RSF Victory or Ongoing? edit

The original article for the battle mentioned a quick RSF seizure of Geneina on April 15, a second capture on May 2, and a third capture of the city on May 14. I could not find any source for this, and the sources used to back the claims up did not mention anything about an RSF capture of Geneina. Most talked about the battle in Khartoum, and even then, not an RSF capture of the city. It seems these RSF victory claims are unfounded, and due to repeated inclusions of the material, I was wondering if anyone could corroborate this. Jebiguess (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Jebiguess Literally read the Middle East Eye article it states:
"The scene in al-Geneina, capital of West Darfur state, is completely different. There, the RSF and its allies have complete control, with the army nowhere to be seen.
Sources in the city told MEE that the RSF and its allied tribal militias quashed any hint of resistance by killing civilians and setting much of al-Geneina on fire, including government offices, homes and the market.
An eyewitness from the Hai al-Shati neighbourhood said the army attempted to counter the RSF in the city on 23 April, before being beaten back, with its soldiers now withdrawn into the military headquarters, where they remain." - Middle East Eye NYMan6 (talk) 19:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
So far, MEE is the only source I see reporting an RSF victory for the second battle. The Sudan Tribune article mentioned in the Wiki one states a ceasefire was put in place strictly between RSF and SAF, albeit tribal clashes were likely to begin.
"Mediation led by leaders from the Native Administration and the Governor of South Darfur, Hamid al-Tijani Hanoun, resulted in a temporary halt to the fighting between the army and the Rapid Support Forces."
Not to mention, the MEE article and the quote above states "There, the RSF and its allies have complete control, with the army nowhere to be seen." Given the context of the preceding paragraph, which talked about Minawi's Joint Darfur Force being used in El Fasher, the statement could also be seen as the SAF is hardly fighting in Geneina rather than RSF having control of the city of Geneina.
On the other hand, it is hard to tell whether the Sudan Tribune article is describing the situation in Nyala or Geneina with that statement. It is possible that clashes simply simmered down inconclusively in Geneina after May 2. Jebiguess (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

On "phases" in dates edit

To say that every pause or attempted ceasefire in fighting represents a completely new "phase" in fighting is untrue. No sources describe a "first" or "second" or "third" or "fourth" phase of fighting in Geneina, and if every pause in fighting is treated as the battle taking a whole new form, then we may end up with well over ten phases of this single battle. They aren't really useful in explaining the battle, and, either way, the "Date" section of a battles' article rarely ever specifies different phases of fighting. Such info is usually not included in the infobox at all, and if it is, it's generally referred to in the "Result" section, in case each phase has different results. In this case, there is already a good amount of detail that goes into the status of the battle, so the phases don't really have a use, or a justification to be there Presidentofyes12 (talk) 19:15, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. The status section adequately shows the scope and results of each phase per se, and the time in between each phase is not complete peace, just less intense fighting. Adding the phase information to the date clutters the infobox and waters down the reality of the conflict. Jebiguess (talk) 22:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

El Geneina Massacre page edit

10,000 killed? Surely this deserves its own page. Teutonkahmun (talk) 15:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

10,000 is not a reliable number. It is what the Masalit leader, Sultan Saad Bahar al-Deen had said. There has been an investigation by the ICC] but no one is using the word genocide or massacre beside locals. Maybe wait or add to the Human rights violations by the Rapid Support Forces (Sudan) article FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Wouldn't say adding it to the Human rights violations by the Rapid Support Forces (Sudan) article, 11,000(+) its very unspecified but it is what we have gathered there could be thousands and thousands more dead it just hasn't been fully confirmed. 2601:183:4081:FEA0:4B3:4D19:D9D:F681 (talk) 22:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC) 2601:183:4081:FEA0:4B3:4D19:D9D:F681 (talk) 22:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please don’t speculate or do any original research as you did with your recent edit. Just find a reliable source first, then edit FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:48, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
It's not like reliable sources are usually wrong too cf. 10,000 98.109.137.129 (talk) 11:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. Regardless of the death toll, the massacre has become half of the page of the battle, and even through the battle, the killings were a heavy focus of most news articles. Jebiguess (talk) 17:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
In January (January 15, 2024) the Panel of Experts on Sudan (panel advising the UN Security Council on sanctions against parties to the conflict) Issued a Final Report. They placed the number of casualties in El Gemeina at 10,000-15,000.
https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n24/005/64/pdf/n2400564.pdf?token=ft4fs3FdWAdUWj7jyN&fe=true
This and all pages on the Sudanese War 2023 need to update, as the casualties on these pages are seriously low compared to reality. Machinetomakecoffee (talk) 22:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I cannot access the link, can you write down the title and author, and I will google it FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Extension edit

After the clashes in the northern part of Geneina this week, killed 800 people. I'm looking for a expansion of the article possibly. There's a lot of new sources talking about the West Darfur atrocities, primarily the Geneina massacre. So we could use this moment to extend the article further add new info.


Any thoughts?


Subaru2000 (talk) 14:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

are you talking about Ardamata massacre? FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply