Talk:Battle of Chumonchin Chan
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Chumonchin Chan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Possible improvements edit
I have just completed the B class check list and feel that the article could be improved by including a list of references and adding in-line citations. Additionally, the article could be expanded to discuss the action in more detail, perhaps providing an overview of the situation at the time as context. Further comments on possible improvements can be sought by adding the article's name to the list at WP:MHPR. Hope this helps. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:32, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Chumonchin Chan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070629131922/http://www.history.navy.mil:80/wars/korea/navalbattles.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/korea/navalbattles.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
USS Baltimore did not sink edit
This and related articles repeatedly assert that the North Koreans could not have sunk the Baltimore because it was not deployed to North Korea. That seems like the wrong way to say it to me. The North Koreans could not have sunk the Baltimore because the Baltimore did not sink. 98.13.244.125 (talk) 17:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)