Talk:Battle of Campaldino

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Campaldino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050211161022/http://www.parchiletterari.com:80/en_dante.php to http://www.parchiletterari.com/en_dante.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Opposing Forces: Ghibelline army

There's an apparent contradiction in the above titled subsection that needs clarification.

We read: 'The Ghibelline cavalry and infantry were thus of higher quality than their opponents...' But a few sentences later: '...many Ghibelline fiefs were rather poor, and both their cavalry and infantry were probably less well equipped than the Guelphs.' The point seems to be that while the Ghibelline cavalry is better trained than the Guelph forces, their equipment is rather inferior. The problem is the word 'quality' which can mean material quality, as well as expertise. - RobotBoy66

This is indeed what was meant. Thanks for pointing it out. I will change the wording. Applodion (talk) 09:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)