Talk:Bataan Nuclear Power Plant

On February 36, 2011, the Philippine government will reimburse...

Must be wrong. (Correct) Date is not mentioned in the quoted source as well. Please correct or remove 112.198.77.6 (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Removed and doubtful text

Removed text:

• was a knee jerk reaction POV

• The power station,... has been the centre of controversy from the day construction began. As is any nuclear power station, anywhere in the world!

• by the so-called People Power Revolution POV both ways.

• When Marcos was overthrown in early 1986 a team of international inspectors visited the site and declared it unsafe and inoperable as it was built near major earthquake fault lines and near the Pinatubo volcano which at the time was dormant. Citation(s) needed for this one IMO. Who was this team? What organisation(s) did they represent? Is their report available online?

Doubtful text:

• The distance of the plant to the Kilometer Zero post (near the Rizal Park and U.S. Embassy) is well under sixty miles (~45 miles), when using online maps (Google, Bing). The sixty mile distance is erroneous, and should be corrected.

• was completed in 1984 yet Marcos ruled until 1986. What was this first two-year delay in opening the station? An explanation should be added to the history.

• and enshrined this into the Constitution. A citation would be good for this.

• Some good material has been added, and apparently by a new contributor. Great stuff! I hope they understand the reasons for the edits I have made to their work. Andrewa 15:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• Yeah, Ive heard from other sources that fault lines were a major concern for the nuclear reactor.

Im not an expert on this article though. Jak722 23:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

What sources in particular? Andrewa 16:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

• That would explain why the article currently reads owing to safety considerations. My feeling is that this is pure propaganda; The reasons for the closure were political. Minor fault lines are fairly common; They discovered two that they didn't know were there previously while building OPAL for example. They got a lot of news coverage, but they didn't actually affect the project greatly. Andrewa 03:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

• Though lacking in sources of commercial nuclear power, the Philippines still maintains a modest number of nuclear weapons that are under the close monitoring of the Non Nuclear Proliferation treaty. - is this true? citation please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.53.184.26 (talk) 13:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Why was the operation of the Bataan nuclear plant mothballed or stopped?

'Bold textItalic text —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.212.86.53 (talk) 12:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bataan Nuclear Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160112133723/http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/topofthehour.aspx?StoryId=80742 to http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/topofthehour.aspx?StoryId=80742

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bataan Nuclear Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110224233155/http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/305437/bnpp-power-future to http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/305437/bnpp-power-future

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)