Talk:Bartonella

New Species June 07

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070607/sc_afp/ushealthbacteria

71.141.235.39 16:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)Steve P.

New article - Bartonella rochalimae -- MarcoTolo 00:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

ticks or not?

Odd that ticks are emphasized in the section on epidemiology, while, in the preceding intro and "infection cycle" sections, the possible role of ticks as vectors is absent or played down.

Agreed. In addition, there are now 32 strains not 8 and biting flies should replace 'sand' flies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.124.163.221 (talk) 17:52, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Well, according to Deer ked and its sources, Bartonella schoenbuchensis is one of them... JoergenB (talk) 15:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

New Bartonella Species That Infects Humans Discovered

Hi,

I added a link to an article in Science Daily which elaborates on the Bartonella melophagi discovery cited. Will add to ref list — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmurphy914 (talk • contribs) 13:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

List of Bartonella species updated

I have updated the list of Bartonella species based on the recent literature and from sequences deposited on GenBank. The link for the list of species is the following:

GenBank Bartonella Taxonomy

But now I am having a hard time trying to fix the formatting of the table entitled "Bartonella pathophysiology in humans" to avoid the gap in the middle of the page. I hope somebody with more HTML experience help us to fix it. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pp diniz (talk • contribs) 17:16, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Very human-centric

Bartonella in humans often comes from other small mammals e.g. voles and mice. There is high diversity of Bartonella species in Europe and North America. Could we at least add some non-human Bartonella paragraph? I would also suggest we take the thrust of the introduction away from humans, and discuss this bacterial infection in general. Aso need to mention possible vertical transmission. Emble64 (talk) 13:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bartonella. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050526171535/http://cdli.asm.org:80/cgi/content/full/9/1/8 to http://cdli.asm.org/cgi/content/full/9/1/8
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140903120210/http://www.peoplespharmacy.com/PP-907ArchBartonella.mp3 to http://www.peoplespharmacy.com/PP-907ArchBartonella.mp3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Role in endocarditis

doi:10.1128/CMR.00013-17 JFW | T@lk 18:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)