Talk:Bart Bok

Cleanup/expansion

I have taken a User copy of this article, which I will try to clean up and expand, especially focusing on providing references. If any editor has material which you think would be helpful, or has feelings about what is / is not appropriate to include, then please comment here so we can discuss it. --Gronk Oz (talk) 03:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done The new version is significantly expanded, and I hope it meets with your approval. --Gronk Oz (talk) 11:04, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Work?

It is not mentioned in the article what his main area of work was; an image briefly mentions that he studied dark nebulae. Maybe someone can go into more detail in his biography? David H. Levy told me last year that he wrote Bok's biography, but I have not read it; maybe someone here did? CielProfond (talk) 00:27, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for calling attention to a serious omission. I've inserted the basic information; perhaps it can be expanded upon later. Hertz1888 (talk) 04:20, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

I was in the process of expanding the article when this discussion came up: hopefully the new version will help to address some of the issues. --Gronk Oz (talk) 11:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Well done

First DYK I've read in a long time that didn't basic typos or brow-furrowing phrasing. Thank you! Shenme (talk) 00:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

My pleasure, Shenme - I'm glad you approve! --Gronk Oz (talk) 08:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Review/ suggested improvements

In response to a question at the Teahouse, Cullen328 offered the following comments:

I took a quick look at Bart Bok and agree that it is better than start class. It is a developed, informative article about a fascinating person and his accomplished wife. On the other hand, it has some problems. Some content in the lead is duplicated word for word in the body. The lead is supposed to summarize the body, not incorporate sentences word for word. Also, there is an excessively long quotation by Bok. My guideline is that a two sentence quote is fine, a three sentence quote is OK but deserves a second look, and a four sentence quote is pushing the limits. So, I suggest that you copy edit that article and then upgrade its rating. Cullen328 04:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bart Bok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.physicstoday.org/resource/1/phtoad/v36/i12/p73_s1?bypassSSO=1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140721002547/http://www.rasc.ca/content/asteroid-1983 to http://www.rasc.ca/content/asteroid-1983

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC)