Talk:Barovia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by 2602:304:CE74:9630:543:BC49:23B8:9A3 in topic Proposed merge with Vistani
 | This page was proposed for deletion by TTN (talk · contribs) on 28 January 2020. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Adding merge-to template, content would seem better fit into Barovia world rather than its own page. Shaded0 (talk) 17:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that Barovia is the optimal merge target. It is not mentioned at all on the Vistani page. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 01:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Vistani are introduced in the Ravenloft (module), and included in Curse of Strahd (which both occur within Barovia). Therefore, I think it would be worth including the content in the Barovia (world) page. I'm less familiar with the original module, and moreso with Curse of Strahd for 5E. It doesn't really seem meritable to include as its own page. Also, from the Vistani page lead paragraph on the page: "Since their introduction in the original Ravenloft module (1983)..." Pulling from a (not great) non-Wikipedia source, here's two webpages that support this (both in reference to Ravenloft/Curse of Strahd).
- Shaded0 (talk) 02:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- It might make more sense to propose it be merged into Ravenloft. 2602:304:CE74:9630:543:BC49:23B8:9A3 (talk) 15:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)