Talk:Barely Legal (magazine)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Is the graphic description in this entry really warranted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.49.54.79 (talk • contribs).

Wikipedia is not censored for minors. I am not into this sort of magazine, but if this is a factual description of what it contains it should be included in this article. If we are going to have articles about pornography, why should they be any less descriptive than articles on other topics? Quepasahombre 03:50, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I removed parts of the descriptions before you reverted, not to censor them, but because they didn't add any information. The article already says that it's a porn magazine that shows women masturbating, so it's redundant to have a laundry list of the parts of themselves that they touch etc. It's not worth getting into an edit war, though. PseudoAnon 05:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The comment about models being shaved "as bare as the day they were born" is both not 100% accurate AND seems worded in an overly flippant manner... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.215.27.176 (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

More developement of the movie series should occur, as well as have the movies have there own seperate page. There is nothing wrong with the general description, it is pornography and I understand your concerns. --Cooly123 (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Barely Legal (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040727021058/http://riveroffilth.com:80/category.cfm/category.cfm?Category=634&CFID=83856&CFTOKEN=30633233 to http://riveroffilth.com/category.cfm/category.cfm?Category=634&CFID=6648452&CFTOKEN=58892516

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic