Talk:Barca d'Alva railway station

Barca d'Alva railway station was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 11, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Portugal Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stations

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of train stations and metro stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StationsWikipedia:WikiProject StationsTemplate:WikiProject StationsStations articles

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Unsuccessful. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Barca d'Alva railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs) 07:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

This article is thoroughly researched and clearly has potential to reach Good Article status. However, it is not there yet, and needs more improvement than can reasonably be expected during a GA review. Two of the Good Article criteria are not met:

1a (the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct): As indicated by the cleanup banner, the translation quality here is not sufficient for GA. For example, there are untranslated phrases like Real orden, mistranslations like automotives, and awkward wording like was re-established and it was also reopened.
1b (it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections...: Two sentences is not a sufficient lede for a 2,500-word article, and it does not accurately summarize the article.

There are also issues with criteria 2c (several unsourced statements/quotes) and 3a (no information about the station building itself).

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rough translation banner edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have attempted to address the issues of the rough translation banner. In this I have been severely hampered by the fact that reference 4 (Sousa, 16 September 1927) which is used 21 times within the article, no longer appears to be online. It has not been archived on the Wayback machine, as every attempt since 2016 reports "Page Not Found". I have been attempting to improve the grammar by looking at what the Portuguese sources actually say, rather than the translations from the Portuguese wiki article. If anyone cares to comment on what has been achieved so far, I would be grateful of feedback. Bob1960evens (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic