This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article seems very biased- if you're going to make statements about the outrageous obscenities and hedonism involved in rituals, then cite them. -Elizabennet 03:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
The article is the copy of a Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable entry (public domain). Until someone introduces additional sources there's nothing to balance the article with, so I have removed the POV-tag.--Six words (talk) 20:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
