Bangladesh Liberation War received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 11 dates. [show]
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bengal, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.BengalWikipedia:WikiProject BengalTemplate:WikiProject BengalBengal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colonialism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ColonialismWikipedia:WikiProject ColonialismTemplate:WikiProject Colonial EmpiresColonialism articles
This article is written in Bangladeshi English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analyse, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2019edit
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Paramilitary Force Number is Unknown but still featured on the infoboxedit
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It is not known how much Paramilitary forces were there, but a source tells us 280,000 on the West Pakistan and East Pakistani Collaborators, we don't know how much were in this conflict, but the whole number 280,000 has been put up. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
India joined the war on 3 December 1971, after which Pakistan launched preemptive air strikes on northern India
This is not sourced , should be removed Afv12e (talk) 00:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Again, WP:LEAD need not be cited if it merely restates material from the article body, which is what the lead is supposed to do. This statement agrees with the body, where it is supported by the Time ref. And it agrees with the cited Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 that is linked. And it's also the well-cited Operation Chengiz Khan article about the operation itself. DMacks (talk) 03:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
What the lead used to say, agreeing with the body of the article, and what Time supports, is "India joined the war on 3 December 1971, after Pakistan launched preemptive air strikes on North India." In rewriting the lead on 25 October 2022, XTheBedrockX added an extra word, "India joined the war on 3 December 1971, after which [emphasis mine] Pakistan launched preemptive air strikes on northern India." I assume it was inadvertent, not some "agenda push", but it changed the meaning by putting the events in the wrong order. Therefore, I've removed the word "which". --Worldbruce (talk) 04:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you!
Yes these topics has sentences which is twisted and placed in wrong order, which will mislead and give another view of the events Afv12e (talk) 04:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why is the UK listed? The Box should only be kept with the 3 powers, Soviets, US and Chinese. The UK i understand were selling weapons to both India and Pakistan, it did not support a party against another, certainly not Pakistan against its own insurgency either. I don't think mere sale of weapons was this particular article's rule precedent policy for listing a country in the support by section. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 19:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
.svg){kind=small}
