Talk:Bally Total Fitness

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

NPOV tag edit

I am disputing the neutrality of this article because, as written, it does not seek to neutrally inform a person of various facts relating to the company, including its controversies. It states certain criticisms of the company without any context as to what the company's general operations are or the response to those criticisms. --Jules7484 04:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I have rewritten the article (it was also nominated for an AfD - not by me). Any thoughts on the neutrality of my rewrite? I have no real opinion about the company.. never been a customer or known anyone with a complaint... so any POV should be accidental. --W.marsh 23:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
Thanks to W.marsh for improving this page. I still wonder about the notability of this company. According to [1] there are 26,000 health clubs in the US, which would mean that Bally represents only 1.5% of the market. WP doesn't have a page for 24HrFitness (or any other fitness club as far as I can see). It's also not really clear whether Bally's consumer complaints are much worse than average, or still a current issue. FRS 23:23, 17 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
OK, on further research, the parent company certainly seems big enough to be notable. It's a NYSE listed holding company with 22K employees. It's SEC filings say that it is the "largest commercial operator of fitness centers in North America in terms of revenues, number of members, and number and square footage of its facilities." [2] In 2003, it had revenue of nearly $1B. It's also involved in some sort of shareholder control lawsuit. FRS 23:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
Actually there is an article for 24 Hour Fitness. I think some better organization is needed though... there isn't really a category for them, that I can find, so it's hard them. I think they're both notable, as well as any other similarly large gym chains... while the 4 million customers claim is a little suspect, the WP:CORP guideline (proposed) is that a company has 1 million customers, which is plausible. --W.marsh 23:55, 17 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
Thanks to W.marsh for the more neutral writing of this article. While the article still is not very thorough (though definitely more so than when it was a POV piece with little information about the company itself), I think that the POV problems have basically been resolved. --Jules7484 01:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of non-cited information edit

I just deleted a stretch of information which was not cited in the source. Wikipedia is not a soapbox.THD3 (talk) 17:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

How to cancel edit

I removed the following text from the article, as it seemed to be Original Research. If it is not, please re-add it to the article, making appropriate citations to Reliable Sources. Thanks, Vectro (talk) 02:56, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Currently, the easiest way to cancel a membership is filing a complaint with the better business bureau

Bally total fitness is one big rip off edit

--72.67.38.231 (talk) 22:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)They only want to make sure they get your money and years later they will charge your account again. Be aware watch out. they totally suckReply

It was never a rip off for me. I've been a member for 25 years and my annual dues were only 75 $. It wasn't perfect, nothing is, but I got a lot more for my money at Bally then most others paying more get at other gyms.68.105.199.216 (talk) 03:06, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Bally Total Fitness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply