Talk:Bahawalpur Province

--81.102.219.185 (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC) South Punjab Bahawalpur.jpg

Inaccuracy, errors and blatant untruths

The article Bahawalpur South Punjab fails to satisfy wikipedia requirement to check accuracy. The map given has no accuracy with demand of province. Personal wishes have added in Criticism section. Therefore i am editing this page--Ameerhamzaabbasi (talk) 07:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Although reference shows 59 but 1 N.A i havent added — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ameerhamzaabbasi (talk • contribs) 10:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• There are many errors in the article as it currently stands. Most of the article is based on a (very biased) opinion rather than fact. In fact some aspects of the article are blatantly untrue. For example the article states that 9 districts rejected the proposal for creation of the Bahawalpur South Punjab province. This simply did not happen. The districts never gave their opinions. The current edit is also self contradictory as it states that the same party which proposed this province also rejected it (again this is not true.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.225.80.75 (talk) 23:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Protection

from edition it should be semi protected because new user can disturb accuracy of this hot topic in pakistan.

Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. - However, as this article has only been edited 10 times in the last 6 months, with no edit-warring, at present, such a request would be refused. - Arjayay (talk) 11:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Wrong editing

The accurate page was again reversed with in accurate material so i again expect protection from new or proxy users I am also reviving old edition--Ameerhamzaabbasi (talk) 06:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC) this requst is acepted but for limited time users who want to edit can request and still edit it--Ali.wali.4550 (talk) 08:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Ameerhamzaabbasi you are one who is recently wanting to put a huge junk of new edits to this article that is why it is your burden to get WP consensus on the talk page for each component of your edits. this is how WP works. you can not modify on a large scale a well established article and immediately ask for page protection. Your editing apparently falls in caste preaching (Abbasi) and POV (point of view) or self research editing. Chronicliana (talk) 17:06, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Ali.wali.4550 is most probably your sock and not an administrator (which he is trying to pretend). Chronicliana (talk) 17:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC) There is a need for you to be abandoned while reverting the article without knowing ground realities about the topic you are just not just full during editing this article Ali is one who wanted to support because of accuracy I think so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ameerhamzaabbasi (talk • contribs) 08:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bahawalpur South Punjab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130131060017/http://www.geo.tv:80/GeoDetail.aspx?ID=85381 to http://www.geo.tv/GeoDetail.aspx?ID=85381
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=&men=gpro&lng=en&des=wg&geo=437641435&srt=pnan&col=abcdefghinoq&msz=1500&geo=-2943
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2013%5C01%5C27%5Cstory_27-1-2013_pg1_3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Merger Discussion Section

I merged the extremely similar article called Saraikistan into this Article. I also am planning to make great changes to it, to add maps and such, information about recent happenings on South Punjab becoming a province, and other stuff. If anyone objects or has other ideas, tell me why here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbasi786786 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Great, thanks for starting this discussion. I have unmerged the articles for the time being, so as there is a chance of obtaining a consensus about the final shape. In my view, though, Saraikistan and BSP are two different concepts, with a separate history and differrent (although overlapping) geo reach, so they should preferably be described in separate articles. — kashmīrī ^TALK 01:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

I understand that they are two different concepts(One being with the Language of Saraiki), but, can they not be sections of the same article, for example, something that has a title of South Punjab, explaining the different province proposals in this general geographic area. Anyways, that article(Saraikistan) has no sources at all. Abbasi786786 ^TALK