 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Ekrixinatosaurus is described as being around 36ft in length. Ekrixinatosaurus was an abelisauroid ceratosaurian, so the comment that Bahariasaurus may have been the largest ceratosaur can't be right. Can we look into this and make any necessary corrections? -- Myrddin_Wyllt 11/19/12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.224.227.201 (talk) 19:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
But bahariasaurus maximum length is 39-40 feet! And some larger ones I saw are 44 feet! And the article says that "same size as t.rex" and that means 39-44 feet!~~Dinosaur Fan~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinosaur Fan (talk • contribs) 00:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
T. rex edit
Was bahariasaurus larger than t.rex, or t.rex was larger? ~~Dinosaur Fan~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinosaur Fan (talk • contribs) 00:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- To date, T. Rex is considered the heaviest theropod that was a biped. More material is needed for Bahariasaurus to get a realistic 'feel' for its size.50.111.3.59 (talk) 10:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Illustration edit
Given the taxonomic uncertainty over Bahariasaurus, I consider it misleading to have a single life restoration on the page. I think there are two options here: either the page should contain a montage of life reconstructions of the different clades Bahariasaurus could belong to (carcharodontosaur, megaraptor-style Deltadromeus, elaphrosaur-style Deltadromeus, etc.)—ideally, all illustrated by a single artist in the same style—or it should contain no life restoration at all. Providing only a single life restoration is a violation of due weight, so I have removed the life reconstruction that was previously on this page. Ornithopsis (talk) 18:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)