Talk:Back in the Game (2019 TV series)

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 20 November 2019 edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago7 comments6 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved both titles as proposed, per consensus. (non-admin closure) – Ammarpad (talk) 07:39, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Back in the Game (CNBC series) → Back in the Game (2019 TV series) – Per WP:NCTV#Additional disambiguation we should not be disambiguating by network. 212.135.65.247 (talk) 16:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Support per guidelines. Also support moving Back in the Game to Back in the Game (2013 TV series) as a 13 episode TV series (3 of which were unaired) isn't that notable for a primary topic. --Gonnym (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support for both moves to Back in the Game (2013 TV series) and Back in the Game (2019 TV series) making Back in the Game a disambiguation page. werldwayd (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Obvious support is obvious, including Back in the Game → Back in the Game (2013 TV series) as well, as per WP:NCTV and WP:INCDAB. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support both moves, and speedy close - obvious application of guideline and WP:NOPRIMARY. -- Netoholic @ 02:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Uh, why hasn't this been closed yet?! – There is overwhelming consensus to move both articles. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic