Talk:Back Dorm Boys

Untitled

It is very important to independently source and cite the statement that the Blogger site has been "proven" to be a hoax. At the moment there is an indirect point within the text (not the appropriate way to verifiably source something on Wikipedia) to a blogger saying that he tracked an email from the author of the blog site and it was in Amsterdam - that doesn't "prove" anything, and the source is of questionable verifiability by my lights, given that this is an accusation of hoaxing, which is pretty strong. What do other editors think? I think it should be deleted until something a bit stronger can be sourced, or perhaps multiple blogger investigations with all evidence posted? NYDCSP 18:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep The William Sledd article was deleted because certain uninformed admins didn't understand what it was all about. He, too, was a youtuber. I believe that these backward admins will be the undoing for Wikipedia. Let's not delete this page. Wikipedia already has a bad name for its admin bullying. James Allen Starkloff 75.89.17.161 00:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep When i came to wikipedia, it showed me real information, actually it was the only information i could find on the back dorm boys. It was when i typed in "chinese boys" it redirected me to the "back dorm boys". without this page, id have no where to look for new information on the backdorm boys, if you delete the page, then ill just make a new one :D
• Keep Keep this page please, they are the only information I can find about them —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.75.229.195 (talk) 01:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC).

English blog controversy

I'm removed all reference to the controversy over the authorship of the English-language Back Dorm Boys blog on Blogger. I think it's pretty obvious looking at the Blogger site that it's a hoax, but the other blog linked to did not really PROVE this. Better evidence comes from plain old common sense. The BDB have a contract with Sina.com, so why would they have an English blog hosted by another site? Why would they devote their English blog primarily to linking to other English blogs, when their official Chinese blog mostly talked about their daily lives and school activities? But it's unlikely that solid proof will ever come to light unless the hoaxer decided to reveal himself, and I don't think we need to waste time and space on the issue here. More important is providing factual, sourced information about the BDB themselves. CKarnstein 18:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

But I don't really see the needs to remove the link to the blog itself. By leaving the site link, but giving description as a hoax, I think it's enough. But, the site itself actually giving much more than it's hoax. And, yes, your analysis is correct: their official Chinese blog mostly talked about their daily lives, so why they need to giving extra work to maintain another english blog if they don't fluent at? Hope many people will come and update this page so it's more up to date, closer and closer to the factual information from their official blog and official site. That's what I thought as the most important thing from a page like this. If there is someone who can gives more information about what the Back Dorm Boys recently do, where they live now, what their job, and what their current plan for the future, it'll be a very useful information for this page. And, maybe, it'll be better if we separate the detailed personal information about them (such as their family, their current location, their biodata, their hobbies, etc) in a "Huang Yi Xin" and a "Wei Wei" page. And for the English site blog, if there is anyone who afraid will get false information from this page, just because this page maybe created based on the hoax English site blog, don't worry, I've crosschecked with some of the official blog content of Back Dorm Boys using translator, and everything seems to be alright (means that this page's information still reliable). Th3 m4rt1n 18:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I have found an english interview page with the Back Dorm Boys, though it's in a blogger, I think it comes from a trustworthy source. Checkout the link section. So now, who are willing to further up completing the Back Dorm Boys information? Th3 m4rt1n 05:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Btw, I have already add some of external source. Isn't it time to review those source, and considering to remove the "lack of in-text citations" ? Th3 m4rt1n 05:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

There are more sources in the AfD discussion if you wanted to find some more. Pandacomics 22:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Photo

The article photo shows (and the caption names) 3 people, but the article only mentions two. I know nothing about this, perhaps someone with more knowledge should adress this? Random89 00:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

It's because during their webcam days, the third guy was there as comic relief. All he would do was play counterstrike in the back, apparently oblivious to the ridiculous lip synching by his roommates. Pandacomics 04:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jayvivi.jpg

Image:Jayvivi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

original

Can someone add links to the original uploads of their virals to youtube? or they've never uploaded to youtube and those videos were re-uploads by others from the beginning?Gendalv (talk) 19:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Back Dorm Boys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070929091354/http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/152096# to http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/152096#

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Back Dorm Boys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/152096%23
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929212411/http://www.samflemming.com/2005/11/china-net-stars-not-just-for-geeks.html to http://www.samflemming.com/2005/11/china-net-stars-not-just-for-geeks.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051106105129/http://www.tian.cc/2005/10/asian-backstreet-boys.html to http://www.tian.cc/2005/10/asian-backstreet-boys.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 13 July 2017 (UTC)