Talk:Back Breaker

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Usefullness of extra headline edit

To show that Back Breaker could have a different sound than Temptation Come my Way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sector311 (talkcontribs) 16:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sadly, such analysis seems to be original research and speculation, which are not things that Wikipedia can use- instead, everything should be verified by reliable sources. J Milburn (talk) 17:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for wasting you time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sector311 (talkcontribs) 17:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem, we were all new once! J Milburn (talk) 18:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm not new and I think we should add it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.146.158 (talk) 21:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Whether you're new or not, you seem to be unfamiliar with our policies. As explained above, Wikipedia cannot accept original research. Any analysis or speculation must have been previously published, and our mention must be attributed to the original. J Milburn (talk) 21:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

When will you people realize that your policies don't mean crap to anyone! Nobody wants a bad artical just because your "Policies" keep it from being good. And it matters a ton that people will know their might be a harder sound. People cared a lot when they heard temptation come my way was going to be softer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.76.43 (talk) 22:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Short answer- if you do not care about our policies, then perhaps you shouldn't be editing. Long answer- our policies are all there for a reason, and showing a little respect to our verifiability and no original research policies would improve Wikipedia massively though making us that little bit more reliable- our main criticism being that we are unreliable. You seem to have no idea what Wikipedia or even an encyclopedia is, and a rant about what someone thinks an album will be like does not make a good encyclopedia article. J Milburn (talk) 23:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

But the people need to know wether or not it will be diferent than the last. Just think about this. If The Showdown where to decide on wether or not it would stay they would say yes. Because more people would buy it if they heard this. Basicly, You can mess with any other artical on wikipedia. Just let this ONE slide please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.76.43 (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

No. We're not here to advertise the album, and we're not here to guess what it is going to be like. J Milburn (talk) 21:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Amen. I agree with you this time.-Sector311 (talk) 22:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok I even agree that was off but, I still think it would help. And ether way the album comes out at most in august and then everything will be clear. So can't we just leave it until then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.148.39 (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Once it comes out, there will be reviews, and you are more than welcome to add the opinions of professional reviewers, as long as you cite your sources. J Milburn (talk) 20:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well I would add it myself but I don't know how. But I do know how to Cite my recorces if this is what you mean.[citation needed]

Well is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.148.39 (talk) 02:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I was the reason this discussion got started and I'm gonna be the reason it finishes. If you want to hear what the album will sound like, you can click on the link in the article leading to The Showdown's youtube channel. You can watch the videos that are there and hear for yourself if you really want to know. Otherwise, wait until the album is out to add a bunch of predictions. I'm speaking to myself too, since I was the one that created the article. -Sector311 (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well ok then.I'm a little bit confused but whatever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.148.39 (talk) 18:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well I watched it and the instruments where amazingly better than both erlier albums but the vocals didn't scream from what I heard so that's a little disapointing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.145.108 (talk) 22:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey could somone post that extra headline in here so I can find out what it said. And I mean just in the discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.145.108 (talk) 22:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, but know that this is only for the discussion page. You CAN NOT paste this into the article. It will be deleted promptly.

The following text is an older revision of Back Breaker and is NOT intended to be in the current revision of the article. " Expected sound: With only bits and pieces of songs from the album shown on their YouTube channel, it is hard to predict what the album will sound like. Generally, Solid State Records has been known to sign more heavier Screamo and Metal bands, with screaming and growling involved. Few vocals have been heard from David Bunton, so it cannot be determined how close "Back Breaker" will be in sound to Temptation Come My Way." -Sector311 (talk) 22:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok I will not copy it into the artical.And it kinda makes sence why that's not in the artical, It doesn't give a whole lot of information anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.128.207 (talk) 20:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC) Finally. -Sector311 (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 19 edit

I added that the album will come out August 19 since it's been confirmed by Hard Music Magizine and other places. I cited it. -Sector311 (talk) 14:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

New section added edit

I added a new section in the article. Is it good or is it pointless?-Sector311 (talk) 13:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC) ..........obviously no one gives a crap..................-Sector311 (talk) 20:29, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Back Breaker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply