Talk:BMW F650CS

Merge into BMW 650 single Article?

Should we merge the content from this article into BMW 650 single? yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 18:01, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

• Oppose No justification is offered for the merge. Why merge? I might be open to it if I knew what the benefits were.

  BMW F650CS is 1,107 words and BMW 650 single 853 words, so you'd get a 1,960 word article that was more than half about the short-lived and not very successful CS variant, giving kind of an imbalanced picture. Instead, the first improvement should be to expand the parent article BMW 650 single with a larger summary of the contents of the child article BMW F650CS. Then expand BMW 650 single for better coverage of the other, more important, 650 single models. After all that's done, then maybe discuss a merge. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:57, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

  • That makes more sense, although I really don't think there's too much content in this article to merge over in its entirety, either way. The rest of the related content simply needs expansion. yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 15:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
• Oppose for the same reasons as Dennis. --Biker Biker (talk) 20:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BMW F650CS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110424020250/http://www.soundrider.com:80/archive/bikes/bmw_f650cs.htm to http://www.soundrider.com/archive/bikes/bmw_f650cs.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)