Talk:Azurik: Rise of Perathia

Combatist

Is 'combatist' even a real word? Why can't the character be described as experienced warrior? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.215.154.5 (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Wait

What didn't these people like about the game? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.178.177.94 (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Gameplay section lacking

As it is right now it reads more like a brief rehearsal of the plot section than a description of actual gameplay mechanics and characteristics.185.163.103.83 (talk) 19:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:VG article reassessment (20 September 2023)

This is a personal template to provide advice in the course of completing a content assessment or reassessment for the WikiProject for video games. It's not a part of the project itself. For formal guidance when creating and editing articles under this project, please consult the project’s content assessment guide and manual of style. The template can be found here.

Category	Flag	Comments
Overall		The article contains meaningful content about the subject matter, and is supported by some citations and multiple sections, but falls short in form and content under the manual of style.
Layout		The article has sections that generally conforms to the standard layout under the manual of style, but is ordered incorrectly or potentially missing sections that may help improve the article.
Lead section		The lead section mostly conforms with the manual of style, but the opening sentence misses key details and/or the paragraph does not summarize the content of the article.
Infobox	Y	The article contains an appropriate infobox.
Gameplay		The article contains a description of gameplay, but is either insufficient to cover a clear description of the game or has excessive or trivial details.
Screenshot and cover art		The article does not contain both a screenshot and cover art for the game.
Plot		The article contains a plot section that may have issues, such as being incomplete or having excessive length, or an inappropriate tone.
Development		The article does not contain a development section, where one may or may not be useful depending on the availability of reliable sources.
Reception		The article does not contain a reception section or lacks substantial content in the section.
Sources		The article contains reliable sources, but the article's content is not well cited, is heavy on primary sources, or the sources are inconsistently or incorrectly cited.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)