This redirect is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Is there anything notable about this housing estate that warrants it having its own article? S a g a C i t y (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
I see the Aycliff article no longer exists. It has not been merged into the Dover article, because Aycliff is not mentioned there. Yet Aycliff is of interest because it is a settlement, part of which no longer exists, therefore it is part of history not to be forgotten. It was a council housing estate, which was partly demolished to make way for a new road. I have found a few pictures of the Aycliff area, which I have categorised on Commons as: Category:Aycliff, Dover. I have not removed the above reqphoto template, because there is probably no place for a photo of Aycliff on the Dover article page. It is still worth resurrecting and rewriting the deleted Aycliff article in respect of its historical value as a partially lost settlement, though. 1950s settlements can be of interest, today. Storye book (talk) 17:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
