Talk:Awakening (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ed! in topic GA Review
Good articleAwakening (Star Trek: Enterprise) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starAwakening (Star Trek: Enterprise) is part of the Star Trek: Enterprise (season 4) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 26, 2013Good article nomineeListed
May 25, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 23, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Manny Coto compared the Vulcans in the Star Trek: Enterprise episode "Awakening" to the Catholic Church during the Protestant Reformation?
Current status: Good article


Fair use rationale for Image:Awakening (ENT episode).jpg edit

 

Image:Awakening (ENT episode).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Awakening (Star Trek: Enterprise)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 02:53, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • The guest actors in the infobox need a citation.
  • Done. I don't know why I keep forgetting that! Miyagawa (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • " Vulcan government seek to make the Enterprise leave orbit so they can attack the Syrrannites" -- You should probably note the Syrrannites are a renegade faction of Vulcans hiding on their planet. This kind of detail is important since the lead is supposed to be so general.
  • " and afterwards the Andorians." -- here it might help to note they are longstanding enemies on the edge of war for awhile.
  • "Plot" Might need a few highlights from the previous episode. It's sort of hard to follow as-written, even as someone who's seen both episodes and reviewed the first article.
  • I've added an additional paragraph to plot to summarise the earlier episode. I fully admit it hadn't occurred to me and I'll keep it in mind for future multi-part episodes (although its really only season four of Enterprise and most of DS9 that had differently named multi-part episodes in Star Trek). Miyagawa (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "However, Archer continues to see the vision who informs him that he must find the Kir'Shara." -- You should explain what the Kir'Shara is.
  • "Filming started on September 23..." -- note the year here, again, so it's clear.
  • No duplicate links. No disambiguation links. External links look good.
  • The image appears to be properly licensed. I see no problems with article stability or neutrality.
Placing the article on hold pending improvements. —Ed!(talk) 03:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Great work. Passing the GA. —Ed!(talk) 11:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply