Copyright problem removed edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/AVE.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

What I did here is to copy and paste some info from one wikipedia article to another wikipedia article about the same topic: The history of the Avant service. In the first wikipedia article about High-speed rail in Spain in general, the content is modified in order to merge with the rest of the history. I do not see any copyright issue. The wikipedia article you are mentioning is an old version of the AVE article, it's content has been split since then to other articles. Clicklander (talk) 09:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article declined as not having reliable sources edit

Hi Vanderwaalforces. How is it possible the sources of this article to be unreliable, when it is about a rail service while the main sources of it are comming from the official webpage of the company providing this service (Renfe)?--Clicklander (talk) 12:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Clicklander To be clear, please read WP:INDEPENDENT. But just a simple view, when writing an article about Mr. A, you are not encouraged to use Mr. A's website as a source. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Vanderwaalforces First, I am not writing about some "Mr. A", I am transferring information about an existing transport service and the only one who is entitled and reliable to tell what this service is about, how exactly it works and what exactly is offering is the one who offers that service. Secondly, apart from the service provider itself, there are 3 additional independent references mentioning this service, one of them is the Spanish state organization for the rail infrastructure in the country and the other 2 are newspaper websites with dates and author names. It can't be more reliable!--~~~~ Clicklander (talk) 14:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Furthermore this article is excluded from the WP:ORG notability guidelines as part of the Transport infrastructure--Clicklander (talk) 07:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply